- Share
Keeping up with the Jansens: Causal Peer Effects on Household Spending, Beliefs and Happiness
How does perceived relative income affect household behavior and well-being? We use a randomized information experiment in a representative panel of Dutch households to generate exogenous variation in beliefs about peers' income. Lower perceived relative standing shifts expenditure toward durable goods but we find little evidence of an increase in total spending. Higher perceived relative income increases socializing and substantially raises happiness, while lower relative income increases subsequent employment. Relative standing also shapes views about inequality and redistribution. A complementary vignette experiment provides supporting evidence on mechanisms. Overall, peer comparisons matter for behavior and well-being even when total spending responses are small.
Working Papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded official Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or the Federal Reserve System.
Suggested Citation
van Rooij, Maarten, Olivier Coibion, Dimitris Georgarakos, Bernardo Candia, and Yuriy Gorodnichenko. 2026. “Keeping up with the Jansens: Causal Peer Effects on Household Spending, Beliefs and Happiness.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper No. 26-29. https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202629
This work by Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
