Skip to:
  1. Main navigation
  2. Main content
  3. Footer
Working Paper

An Investigation into the Uncertainty Revision Process of Professional Forecasters

Following Manzan (2021), this paper examines how professional forecasters revise their fixed-event uncertainty (variance) forecasts and tests the Bayesian learning prediction that variance forecasts should decrease as the horizon shortens. We show that Manzan's (2021) use of first moment "efficiency" tests are not applicable to studying revisions of variance forecasts. Instead, we employ monotonicity tests developed by Patton and Timmermann (2012) in the first application of these tests to second moments of survey expectations. We find strong evidence that the variance forecasts are consistent with the Bayesian learning prediction of declining monotonicity.

Working Papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded official Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or the Federal Reserve System.


Suggested Citation

Clements, Michael P., Robert W. Rich, and Joseph Tracy. 2024. “An Investigation into the Uncertainty Revision Process of Professional Forecasters.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper No. 24-19. https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202419