A Spanner in the Works: Restricting Labor Mobility and the Inevitable Capital-Labor Substitution
We model an environment with overlapping generations of labor to show that policies restricting labor mobility increase a firm's monopsony power and labor turnover costs. Subsequently, firms increase capital expenditure, altering their optimal capital-labor ratio. We confirm this by exploiting the statewide adoption of the inevitable disclosure doctrine (IDD), a law intended to protect trade secrets by restricting labor mobility. Following an IDD adoption, local firms increase capital expenditure (capital-labor ratio) by 3.5 percent (5.5 percent). This result is magnified for firms with greater human capital intensity. Finally, IDD adoptions do not spur investment in either R&D or growth options as intended.
Working Papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded official Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or the Federal Reserve System.
Suggested Citation
Kannan, Bharadwaj, Roberto B. Pinheiro, and Harry Turtle. 2022. “A Spanner in the Works: Restricting Labor Mobility and the Inevitable Capital-Labor Substitution.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper No. 22-30. https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202230
- Share