Skip to:
  1. Main navigation
  2. Main content
  3. Footer
Working Paper

Federal Reserve Credibility and the Market's Response to the Weekly M1 Announcements

This paper provides new evidence on the issue of Federal Reserve System credibility by examining the response pattern of asset prices to the weekly M1 announcements under different operating procedures and monetary policy regimes in the September 1977 to December 1984 period. It is found that the response of asset prices to money surprises represented revisions of inflationary expectations in the pre-October 6, 1979, period and that the Federal Reserve was not credible. On the contrary, the response of asset prices to money surprises represented revisions of real interest rates in the post-October 6, 1979, period and the Federal Reserve was credible. Furthermore, the evidence shows that the October 1982 return to an interest-rate-smoothing procedure did not result in any loss of the System’s credibility, suggesting that credibility, once attained, does not depend on the short- run operating procedure.

Working Papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded official Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or the Federal Reserve System.


Suggested Citation

Gavin, William T., and Nicholas V. Karamouzis. 1985. “Federal Reserve Credibility and the Market's Response to the Weekly M1 Announcements.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper No. 85-02.