Skip to:
  1. Main navigation
  2. Main content
  3. Footer
Working Paper

On the Evolution of U.S. Foreign-Exchange-Market Intervention: Thesis, Theory, and Institutions

Attitudes about foreign-exchange-market intervention in the United States evolved in tandem with views about monetary policy as policy makers grappled with the perennial problem of having more economic objectives than independent instruments with which to achieve them. This paper—the introductory chapter to our history of U.S. foreign exchange market intervention—explains this thesis and summarizes our conclusion: The Federal Reserve abandoned frequent foreign-exchange-market intervention because, rather than providing a solution to the instruments-versus-objectives problem, it interfered with the Federal Reserve’s ability to credibly commit to low and stable inflation. This chapter also provides a theoretical discussion of intervention, background on U.S. institutions for conducting intervention, and a roadmap to the remainder of our book.

Working Papers of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment on research in progress. They may not have been subject to the formal editorial review accorded official Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland publications. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or the Federal Reserve System.


Suggested Citation

Bordo, Michael D., Owen F. Humpage, and Anna Schwartz. 2011. “On the Evolution of U.S. Foreign-Exchange-Market Intervention: Thesis, Theory, and Institutions.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper No. 11-13. https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-201113