Skip to:
  1. Main navigation
  2. Main content
  3. Footer
Economic Commentary

Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Bank Regulation, Part II

Part I of this article, presented in the February 1 Economic Commentary, described some of the costs and benefits of providing federal deposit insurance. The major benefit of providing deposit insurance is the prevention of contagious bank runs-a bank failure that spreads to solvent banks. Part II, presented here, discusses why bank runs may be contagious and examines some of the ways in which private clearinghouses protected against widespread bank failures. The article concludes that federally provided deposit insurance may not be necessary in order to protect against such bank runs.

The views authors express in Economic Commentary are theirs and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The series editor is Tasia Hane. This paper and its data are subject to revision; please visit clevelandfed.org for updates.

Suggested Citation

Carlstrom, Charles T. 1988. “Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Bank Regulation, Part II.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary 2/15/1988.

This work by Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International