The Yield Curve and Predicted GDP Growth, October 2015
September 26, 2015 – October 30, 2015
|3-month Treasury bill rate (percent)||0.05||0.01||0.05|
|10-year Treasury bond rate (percent)||2.11||2.16||2.12|
|Yield curve slope (basis points)||206||215||207|
|Prediction for GDP growth (percent)||1.9||2.0||2.0|
|Probability of recession in 1 year (percent)||4.21||3.66||2.60|
Overview of the Latest Yield Curve Figures
The yield curve got flatter between September and October. The short end rose (it didn’t have much room to fall), with the three-month (constant maturity) Treasury bill rate rising to 0.05 percent (for the week ending October 30), up from September’s 0.01 percent (for the week ending September 25), and even with August’s number of 0.05 percent. The ten-year rate (also constant maturity) fell 5 basis points to 2.11 percent, down from September’s 2.16 percent and just below the August’s number of 2.12 percent. The twist brought the spread to 206 basis point, down from September’s 215 basis points, but up from August’s 207 basis points.
The flatter slope did not have a large impact on predicted real GDP growth, though expected growth did tick down a bit. Using past values of the spread and GDP growth suggests that real GDP will grow at about a 1.9 percent rate over the next year, down from the 2.0 percent rates seen in both August and September. The influence of the past recession continues to push towards relatively low growth rates, but recent year-over-year growth has been stronger (particularly for the second quarter on 2015) and is counteracting that push. Although the time horizons do not match exactly, the forecast comes in slightly more pessimistic than some other predictions, but like them, it does show moderate growth for the year.
The flatter slope led to a small increase in the probability of recession. Using the yield curve to predict whether or not the economy will be in recession in the future, we estimate that the expected chance of the economy being in a recession next October is 4.21 percent, a bit more than half of a percentage point higher than September’s estimate (3.66 percent) and up a bit from August’s estimate (2.60). So the yield curve is optimistic about the recovery continuing, even if it is somewhat pessimistic with regard to the pace of growth over the next year.
The Yield Curve as a Predictor of Economic Growth
The slope of the yield curve—the difference between the yields on short- and long-term maturity bonds—has achieved some notoriety as a simple forecaster of economic growth. The rule of thumb is that an inverted yield curve (short rates above long rates) indicates a recession in about a year, and yield curve inversions have preceded each of the last seven recessions (as defined by the NBER). One of the recessions predicted by the yield curve was the most recent one. The yield curve inverted in August 2006, a bit more than a year before the current recession started in December 2007. There have been two notable false positives: an inversion in late 1966 and a very flat curve in late 1998.
More generally, a flat curve indicates weak growth and conversely, a steep curve indicates strong growth. One measure of slope, the spread between ten-year Treasury bonds and three-month Treasury bills, bears out this relation, particularly when real GDP growth is lagged a year to line up growth with the spread that predicts it.
Predicting GDP Growth
We use past values of the yield spread and GDP growth to project what real GDP will be in the future. We typically calculate and post the prediction for real GDP growth one year forward.
Predicting the Probability of Recession
While we can use the yield curve to predict whether future GDP growth will be above or below average, it does not do so well in predicting an actual number, especially in the case of recessions. Alternatively, we can employ features of the yield curve to predict whether or not the economy will be in a recession at a given point in the future. Typically, we calculate and post the probability of recession one year forward.
Of course, it might not be advisable to take these numbers quite so literally, for two reasons. First, this probability is itself subject to error, as is the case with all statistical estimates. Second, other researchers have postulated that the underlying determinants of the yield spread today are materially different from the determinants that generated yield spreads during prior decades. Differences could arise from changes in international capital flows and inflation expectations, for example. The bottom line is that yield curves contain important information for business cycle analysis but like other indicators, should be interpreted with caution. For more detail on these and other issues related to using the yield curve to predict recessions, see the Commentary “Does the Yield Curve Signal Recession?” Our friends at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York also maintain a website with much useful information on the topic, including their own estimate of recession probabilities.