Meet the Author

Ed Nosal |

Senior Research Advisor

Ed Nosal was formerly a senior research advisor in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

Meet the Author

Michael Shenk |

Research Assistant

Michael Shenk

Michael Shenk was formerly a research assistant in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. His work focused on international topics and housing-market indicators.

04.05.07

Economic Trends

Business Investment

Ed Nosal and Michael Shenk

While the housing market and the subprime sector have dominated the media’s recent coverage of the economy, other indicators of current and future performance have, for some reason, received less attention. One rather important determinant for both current and future performance is business fixed investment—spending by businesses on structures, equipment, and software. February’s report on durable goods showed that new orders for capital goods had increased 7.6 percent, which appears to be a very healthy monthly increase. However, when one digs a little deeper into the report, that number is not so comforting.

The report on capital goods orders is actually quite volatile, with monthly fluctuations of plus or minus ten percent not being that uncommon. Just as volatile components are removed from the Consumer Price Index to get a better idea of the underlying trend in prices, we might want to construct a core-type series for durables to get a better grip on their underlying trend. To do this for capital goods, we will first want to net out defense spending, since we are largely interested in what the private, and not the government sector, is up to. The series net of the government is also rather volatile. It turns out that private aircraft orders are extremely volatile on a month-to-month basis; aircrafts are very expensive, and orders arrive in a very lumpy fashion. When we net out government and private aircraft orders from capital goods spending, we should get a better feel for the underlying trend for this series and for the state of business investment.

Orders for “core” capital goods were fairly weak in February, falling 2.4 percent during the month. What’s worse is that this decline follows a large 6.2 percent decline in January. If this pace has continued through March, orders for “core” capital goods will have fallen 7.2 percent in the first quarter of 2007. So what does this mean for the economy? While one should not read too much into a few months’ numbers, the “core” numbers for capital goods, along with the weak new residential construction numbers, do not paint a very rosy picture for investment.