| Title |
Date |
Publication |
Author(s) |
Type |
| Foreclosures in Ohio: Does Lender Type Matter?
|
December, 2007 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper no. 0724 |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Working Papers |
| Abstract: Whether mortgages are originated mostly by depository institutions regulated by the Federal agencies or by less-regulated lenders does not seem to affect the foreclosure filing rate in Ohio's counties. What seems to matter is whether the lenders have a physical presence in the market, in which case, foreclosure rates are lower.
|
top |
| Prepayment Penalties on Subprime Mortgages
|
September, 2007 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Economic Commentary |
| Abstract: As a result of the subprime mortgage mess, prepayment penalties are under close scrutiny. While these, like other kinds of contract terms, can be abused, there are good reasons for why they exist. In principle, they serve to extend credit to a greater number of borrowers.
|
top |
| On the Resolution of Financial Crises: The Swedish Experience
|
June, 2007 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Policy Discussion Paper, no. 21 |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Policy Discussion Papers |
| Abstract: Sweden was one of the Scandinavian countries experiencing a severe financial crisis In the late 1980s and early 1990s. This paper reviews the policy choices and external factors that pushed the country's financial system over the edge and then examines the steps the government took to make its resolution of the crisis one of the most successful in the past 30 years.
|
top |
| Home Price Derivatives
|
January, 2007 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Economic Commentary |
| Abstract: Until recently, homeowners had no way to protect the value of their homes against losses that could result from housing market downturns. With the derivatives contracts introduced by the CME last year, homeowners now have some means of protection, and new and better products are more likely to follow from them.
|
top |
| Industrial Loan Companies
|
October, 2006 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; James B Thomson; |
Economic Commentary |
| Abstract: Once Wal-Mart announced its intention to acquire an industrial loan company, a public furor arose that has brought a lot of attention to a type of institution that has existed for quite some time, but was not widely recognized outside of banking circles. What are ILCs and why have they become so controversial lately?
|
top |
| Systemic Banking Crises
|
February, 2005 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Policy Discussion Paper, no. 9 |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; James B Thomson; |
Policy Discussion Papers |
| Abstract: Systemic banking crises can have devastating effects on the economies of developing or industrialized countries. This Policy Discussion Paper reviews the factors that weaken banking systems and make them more susceptible to crises.
|
top |
| Dividends
|
April, 2004 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Economic Commentary |
| Abstract: In recent years, there has been increasing pressure on U.S. corporations to distribute earnings to shareholders in the form of dividends. This Commentary explains that dividends are important, but investors can err by reading too much into them.
|
top |
| Securitization
|
August, 2003 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Economic Commentary |
| Abstract: Obscure just 20 years ago, loan portfolio securitization by private and government-sponsored enterprises is a $5 trillion business today. This Commentary explains the reasons behind the spectacular growth of asset-backed securities.
|
top |
| Information and Prices
|
May, 2003 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; Joseph G Haubrich; |
Economic Commentary |
| Abstract: Information problems pervade the economy. This Commentary describes the challenges they create and the clever solutions markets find to overcome them.
|
top |
| Financial System Structure and Economic Development: Structure Matters
|
January, 2003 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper no. 0305 |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Working Papers |
| Abstract: This paper investigates how the structure of a financial system?whether it is bank or market oriented?
affects economic growth. In contrast to earlier research, which indicates that the financial system?s
structure is irrelevant for growth, I find that countries grow faster when they have flexible judicial system
and more market-oriented financial systems.
|
top |
| Legal Systems and Bank Development
|
February, 2002 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Economic Commentary |
| Abstract: In some countries, banks are firms’ key source of financing. In others, firms look mainly to credit markets to meet their financial needs. Why should this be so? New research suggests that a country’s legal tradition strongly influences which financial system becomes dominant there.
|
top |
| Community Banks as Small Business Lenders: The Tough Road Ahead
|
January, 2002 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper no. 0203 |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Working Papers |
| Abstract: This paper investigates the performance of community banks as
small business (relationship) lenders. Theory suggests that
competition reduces the benefits of bank-borrower relationships,
making small business loans more risky and less profitable. In
support of this theory, the evidence indicates that community
banks? performance deteriorates with increasing small business
lending. Policies that encourage community banks to engage in
more aggressive small business lending may lessen the soudness
of these institutions.
|
top |
| Theories of loan commitments: a literature review
|
September, 2001 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 2-19 |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Economic Review |
| Abstract: A loan commitment is an agreement by which a bank promises to lend to a customer at prespecified terms while retaining the right to renege on its promise if the borrower's creditworthiness deteriorates. The contract also specifies the various fees that must be paid over the life of the commitment. Loan commitments are widely used in the economy. As their use has spread, a rich literature has evolved to explain why they exist, how they are priced, and how they affect the risk of the bank and the deposit insurer. This article summarizes what we have learned on these issues. Its main insight is that loan commitments are an optimal tool for risk sharing and for resolving informational problems. The author also points out some issues that the current literature leaves unexplained.
|
top |
| Market- vs. Bank-Based Financial Systems: Do Investor Rights Really Matter?
|
January, 2001 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper no. 0101R |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Working Papers |
| Abstract: Why are common-law countries market-dominated and civil-law
countries bank-dominated? This paper provides an explanation
tied to legal traditions. Civil-law courts have been less
effective in resolving conflicts than common-law courts
because civil-law judges traditionally refrain from
interpreting the codes and creating new rules. In a civil-law
environment, where potential conflicts between borrowers and
individual lenders inhibit the development of markets because
the courts are unable to penalize defrauding borrowers, I
show that banks can induce borrowers to honor their
obligations by threatening to withhold services that only
banks can provide. In other words, banks emerge as the
primary contract enforcers in economies where courts are
imperfect.
|
top |
| Relationship Loans and Information Exploitability in a Competitive Market: Loan Commitments vs. Spot Loans
|
January, 2000 |
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper no. 0013 |
Ozgur Emre Ergungor; |
Working Papers |
| Abstract: Despite the numerous benefits of loan commitments, only 79% of the commercial and industrial
loans are made under commitment. I show that two factors limit the use of loan commitments.
First, because banks commit themselves to lend, they carry costly liquidity reserves to meet their
obligations. Due to liquidity costs, the interest rate on commitment loans is high relative to spot
loans. Second, high interest rates trigger moral hazard. If the bank expects a profitable relationship
in the future, it can absorb a portion of the liquidity costs to reduce the interest rate and attenuate
moral hazard. If not, the borrower cannot get a loan commitment.
|
top |