Site map Go to Home page Contact info Go to Home page Pittsburgh office Cincinnati office Cleveland office
About the Fed Services for Financial Institutions Banking Information Community Development Consumer Information Economic research & data News & Events Publications Education Resources

Research
Regional Research and Data
Regional Home    
Regional Profile    
Current trends    
Regional research    
Beige Book    
Charts and Data    

Monetary Policy

Inflation Central

Economic Modeling
Economic Research and Data  
Fourth District Banking Conditions
 

October 2004 

Fourth District Net Income

FDIC-insured commercial banks headquartered in the Fourth Federal Reserve District continued the past two years' strong earnings performance into the first half of 2004. Their net income was $5.88 billion for these six months ($11.76 billion on an annual basis); this set a pace that, if maintained, will break the record of $11.1 billion set in 2003. Overall, Fourth District bank performance was representative of the U.S. banking industry, which posted unprecedented earnings in the first half of 2004.

 

Fourth District Income Ratios*

Bank earnings remained strong--despite continued shrinkage in the net interest margin caused by low interest rates--because the yield on earning assets fell more quickly than the cost of funds. By the end of 2004:IIQ, Fourth District banks offset smaller margins with sharp growth in non-interest income, which made up a record 35.76 percent of total income. This performance was similar to that of their counterparts nationwide, whose comparable figure was 36.47 percent.

 

Fourth District Earnings*

 

Fourth District Efficiency*

Improved efficiency was another factor in banks' stellar earnings performance in the past few years. Efficiency is measured by operating expenses as a percent of net interest income plus non-interest income, so lower numbers correspond to greater efficiency. Although Fourth District banks' 53.6 percent efficiency ratio at the end of 2004:IIQ did not quite equal their 52.6 percent at the end of 2002, this ratio (which is inversely related to efficiency) remained well below its recent high of 62.6 percent in 1998.

District banks posted a return on assets of 1.53 percent for the first half of 2004, up slightly from 1.49 percent at the end of 2003; return on equity also rose, reaching 19.0 percent. This compared favorably with their own first-half profit performance in recent years and with the nation’s 1.19 percent return on assets and 13.72 percent return on equity. Overall, financial indicators for banks in the Fourth Federal Reserve District point to strengthening balance sheets.

 

Fourth District Asset Quality*

Asset quality showed continued signs of improvement during the first half of 2004. Net charge-offs (losses realized on loans and leases currently in default minus recoveries on previously charged-off loans and leases) for the first six months of the year represented an annualized 0.56 percent of total loans. Problem assets (nonperforming loans and repossessed real estate) as a share of loans and leases fell to 0.61 percent from 0.77 percent at the end of 2003. Fourth District Banks' improvement in asset quality mirrored that of the overall banking industry, in which net chargeoffs were 0.58 percent of loans and nonperforming loans were 0.59 percent of assets.

 

Fourth Distict Coverage Ratio

Reflecting an industrywide trend toward stronger balance sheets, Fourth District banks held $16.61 in equity capital and loan loss reserves for every dollar of problem loans, well above the recent low in the coverage ratio of 10.75 at the end of 2002.

 

Fourth District Core Capital (Leverage) Ratio

This improvement resulted largely from a marked reduction in problem loans and a slight strengthening of bank capital. Equity capital as a percent of Fourth District banks’ assets rose somewhat, moving from 8.04 percent at the end of 2003 to nearly 8.05 percent by the end of 2004:IIQ.

 

Fourth District Unprofitable Institutions

Improved asset quality was also reflected in the percent of unprofitable institutions, which fell to 5.61 percent from nearly 5.88 percent at the end of 2003. However, the average size of unprofitable banks increased in 2004 as assets in unprofitable institutions increased slightly from 2.02 percent to 2.63 percent of Fourth District banks' assets.